Messages in this thread | | | From | "Ghorai, Sukumar" <> | Date | Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:02:05 +0530 | Subject | RE: [PATCH] mmc: MMC 4.4 DDR support |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc- > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Ball > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4:52 PM > To: Adrian Hunter > Cc: Andrew Morton; Matt Fleming; Linus Walleij; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com; > Hanumath Prasad; Kyungmin Park > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: MMC 4.4 DDR support > > Hi Hanumath, Linus, > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:30:45PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > I am not able to test DDR mode but it look to me that the patch > > should be changed. Here is a fix: > > > > From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> > > Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:20:26 +0300 > > Subject: [PATCH] mmc: Fix Dual Data Rate (DDR) support > > Could someone please test Adrian's patch and report back? I'd like > to merge this, but not without testing. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/177332/
[Ghorai] I was testing this patch (Adrian's) and top of patch[1] from Hanumath; Looks working fine as functionality. Checking throughput in my omap platform. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/9/35 But there are few comments on this patch from others, I think. And is not applying cleanly in latest codebase. Also following #define is conflicting with Hanumath's patch. File: include/linux/mmc/host.h #define MMC_CAP_ERASE (1 << 10)
> > Thanks, > > -- > Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/> > One Laptop Per Child > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| |