Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:24:29 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86, mrst: make mrst_identify_cpu() inlne inside mrst.h |
| |
* Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:57:26 +0200 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > > > * Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:08:53 +0800 > > > Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Otherwise there will be some compilation warning for those .c files > > > > which include mrst.h > > > > > > I've sent this to Ingo four or five times already and been ignored. > > > > I did a search of my mbox for all mails containing > > 'mrst_identify_cpu', and the one by Feng Tang sent yesterday is the > > only one - none from you. Searched the spam folder and the separate > > lkml folder too. > > > > So where are those 4-5 emails, got any link perhaps? > > They went to your address and my logs show they hit Intel internally > but I can't really see beyond that - I've mailed you directly a > different email to try and work out where they vanished so if you see > this and no direct mail then that would explain much. If you see both > but didn't see the mail recently about SFI device creation from me > then it's specific to the stgit setup sent emails.
I think there must be an email problem somewhere. I did get the:
[RFC PATCH] x86/mrst: add SFI platform device parsing code
mail and the earlyprintk mails - but before that the only patch i got from you was:
[PATCH] IPC driver for Intel Mobile Internet Device (MID) platforms
back in April ... i.e. nothing for many months.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |