[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sh: remove RELOC_HIDE on exception handlers and syscall routines
    2010-08-09 (월), 16:29 +0100, Stuart Menefy:
    > Unfortunately these are necessary, although it is nothing to do with linker
    > relocation. These functions take a struct pt_regs as a parameter (not a
    > pointer), and modify some of the fields of that structure. We needed a way
    > to ensure that gcc didn't optimise away those assignments - to gcc
    > they appear to be assignments to a local variable, so quite legitimately
    > get optimised away. So we used RELOC_HIDE() as a way of doing that.

    Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you for the comments.

    > A clearer way to do this would be to pass in a struct pt_regs pointer,
    > but that would require going via a stub function which loads up the
    > pointer.
    > Stuart

    So is it worth if I'm gonna work on it?

    Namhyung Kim

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-10 05:13    [W:0.021 / U:15.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site