[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
    On 9 August 2010 22:56, Justin P. Mattock <> wrote:
    > On 08/09/2010 02:28 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
    >> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:15 +0300, Mihai Donțu wrote:
    >>> Wait. I don't think we're on the same page here. I'm talking about
    >>> message
    >>> signing (which does not require the receiving end to have any key - it's
    >>> the
    >>> same plain text e-mail with a blob after it) while you refer to actually
    >>> encrypting the message. Mm? Or am I being extremely slow today? :-)
    >> Only when you assume that Exchange would pass signed messages without
    >> corrupting them. It really is that broken.
    > figured the encryption would be kind of a last resort situation..but if it's
    > that broken to where it wont pass it along without corrupting, then the best
    > solution is to figure out what Microsoft needs in terms of encoding, i.e. is
    > there a way to have the scanner scan but not throw everything around after
    > it scans.(if this is what it's doing)

    The link I posted earlier seems to give the impression that
    quoted-printable might do that. I may have misread that, though...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-10 00:15    [W:0.027 / U:95.544 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site