lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] lp3971: remove unnecessary ret value checking in lp3971_i2c_write()
2010/8/5 Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:22:13PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> 2010/8/5 Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
>
>> > but can I once more renew my request that you make some effort to
>> > provide subject lines for your patches which are consistent with the
>> > standard used for the area of the kernel you're submitting to?
>
>> I think we have communication problem.
>> I thought the subject "[PATCH 1/2] lp3971: remove unnecessary ret
>> value checking in lp3971_i2c_write()"
>> is pretty clear.
>> Or do you mean something else?
>
> In this case pretty much every regulator API patch has a subject line
> starting "regulator: " but none of your patches do this, you have
> created your own style which you use over all your patches.
>

Got your point now. Will fix it next time.

Thanks,
Axel


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-06 01:59    [W:0.148 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site