| Date | Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:26:27 -0400 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] vmscan: synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() |
| |
On 08/05/2010 02:13 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > When synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to > reclaim pages even if page is locked. We use lock_page() instead > trylock_page() in this case. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
-- All rights reversed
|