[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/7] vmscan: synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page()
On 08/05/2010 02:13 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> When synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to
> reclaim pages even if page is locked. We use lock_page() instead
> trylock_page() in this case.
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <>

All rights reversed

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-05 17:29    [W:0.131 / U:2.756 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site