lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:19:20PM -0700, david@lang.hm wrote:
>
>> only consider the activity of a subset of processes when deciding if we
>> should suspend or not. If the decision is to suspend, freeze everything.
>>
>> you (and many other people) are confusing what I've proposed (use cgroups
>> to indicate what processes to care about and what ones to not care about
>> when deciding to suspend/go to idle) with the prior cgroup proposal (use
>> cgroups to freeze a subset of tasks while leaving others runnable)
>
> The decision on whether or not to go to sleep isn't the difficult bit of
> this problem space.

but isn't that all that wakelocks do? affect the decision on whether or
not to go to sleep.

David Lang


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-05 16:11    [W:0.327 / U:1.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site