lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:02:28PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:

> Which makes the driver and/or network stack changes identical to using
> wakelocks, right?

I think we're resigned to the fact that we need to indicate wakeup
events in a manner that's pretty equivalent to wakelocks. The only real
issue is what the API looks like. Anyone who's still talking about
cgroups seems to be trying to solve a different problem.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-05 15:45    [W:2.804 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site