lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (scsi-post-merge tree related)
Hi James,

On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:14:02 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > >Yikes. Last minute change, eh?
> > >
> > > I do not know what you mean. The patches always had iscsi_boot_sysfs in
> > > the firmware dir. You mean this is a last minute change?
> >
> > Yes, this rename.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >>interface is generic and should be used on any arch and with anything
> > > >>(ibft or iscsi driver) that wants to export iscsi boot info. The
> > > >>attached patch moves iscsi_boot_sysfs to drivers/scsi. It was made over
> > > >>linux-next. I have only compile tested it.
> > > >
> > > >did you compile test it with the x86 native iBFT driver?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> >
> > Excellent. The patch does not look like it has changed at all, so:
> >
> > 1). Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>
> > for the removal from firmware/ibft, and
> > 2). Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org> for the
> > the part that puts in drivers/scsi and will make it now under James'
> > mainternship.
> >
> > James,
> >
> > I've asked Linus to pull my iBFT tree before yours as there was this
> > dependency. Are you OK putting this patch in your tree, or would you prefer
> > that I expunge Mike's patch from mine?
>
> I can put this patch into my post merge tree. I suspect you having a
> post-post-merge tree (needed for the build problems) might be a bit
> overkill ...

Ping?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-05 03:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans