Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:24:44 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]: Compress hibernation image with LZO (in-kernel) |
| |
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:24:57 +1000 Nigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net> wrote:
> Yes, because what's being written is the snapshot that was created in > hibernation_snapshot. Any memory you allocate afterwards is irrelevant > because it's not part of that snapshot that was made earlier and is now > being written to disk. Think of the point where hibernation_snapshot is > called as being like taking a photo, and this later part as like > printing the photo. Once you've taken the photo, people in the photo can > move around without making any difference to the photo you've taken. So > here. Our vmallocs and so on after the snapshot don't affect it. >
I see. I misunderstood swsusp_save(). Sorry for tons of noises.
Thanks, -Kame
| |