[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] x86-64: software IRQ masking and handling
    On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 07:07:16 am Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
    > Of course if it becomes core to the x86 architecture or the kernel
    > overall, then most of the irq-related paravirt-ops can go away and be
    > limited to the actual interrupt handler and the machinery needed to
    > really mask/unmask the hardware and set the pending flag (which would
    > likely just be contained within the hypervisor-specific code, and not
    > need any new kernel interfaces to replace the dropped paravirt irq ones).

    Yep, we sweat over the cli/sti paravirtual implementations because it's so
    common. If the kernel used soft cli/sti we could simply implement it with
    a hypercall and be much happier (though iret possibly still an issue).


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-04 04:11    [W:0.030 / U:39.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site