lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 03/43] ptrace: change signature of arch_ptrace()
Date
On Friday 27 August 2010 18:20:55 Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> > Would it be possible to rearrange your patches so that you don't break
> > anything in the middle? I think merging all the trivial 'change signature'
> > patches into one would also make reviewing easier. Nobody in their
> > right mind is looking through a full series of 43 patches, especially
> > if they do not make sense on their own, but one patch that changes a
> > function signature tree-wide would be looked at by many people and can
> > be applied standalone.
> >
>
> OK. Will combine those.
> BTW, one thing I wonder is it will have huge CC list of arch maintainers
> in commit message, so is it usual? or is there other way?

I'd say you don't have to for a trivial patch such at this, as long as
you keep linux-arch@vger.kernel.org on Cc, since that has all the arch
maintainers. It also doesn't hurt to keep them all on Cc, since it would
only be a single mail then.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-29 15:43    [W:0.057 / U:0.624 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site