[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 03/43] ptrace: change signature of arch_ptrace()
On Friday 27 August 2010 18:20:55 Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <> writes:
> > Would it be possible to rearrange your patches so that you don't break
> > anything in the middle? I think merging all the trivial 'change signature'
> > patches into one would also make reviewing easier. Nobody in their
> > right mind is looking through a full series of 43 patches, especially
> > if they do not make sense on their own, but one patch that changes a
> > function signature tree-wide would be looked at by many people and can
> > be applied standalone.
> >
> OK. Will combine those.
> BTW, one thing I wonder is it will have huge CC list of arch maintainers
> in commit message, so is it usual? or is there other way?

I'd say you don't have to for a trivial patch such at this, as long as
you keep on Cc, since that has all the arch
maintainers. It also doesn't hurt to keep them all on Cc, since it would
only be a single mail then.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-29 15:43    [W:0.075 / U:5.952 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site