[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 00/11] sched: CFS low-latency features
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 11:21 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Upon timer expiration, invoke sigev_notify_function as if it
> were the start function of a new thread. (Among the implementa‐
> tion possibilities here are that each timer notification could
> result in the creation of a new thread, or that a single thread
> is created to receive all notifications.) The function is
> invoked with sigev_value as its sole argument. If
> sigev_notify_attributes is not NULL, it should point to a
> pthread_attr_t structure that defines attributes for the new
> thread (see pthread_attr_init(3).
> So basically, it's the glibc implementation that is broken, not the standard.

The standard is broken too, what context will the new thread inherit?
The pthread_attr_t stuff tries to cover some of that, but pthread_attr_t
doesn't cover all inherited task attributes, and allows for some very
'interesting' bugs [1].

The specification also doesn't cover the case where the handler takes
more time to execute than the timer interval.

[1] - consider the case where pthread_attr_t includes the stack and we
use a spawn thread on expire policy and then run into the situation
where the handler is delayed past the next expiration.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-27 17:43    [W:0.083 / U:11.828 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site