lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()
From
Date
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:25 -0700, Gary King wrote:
> The patch seems fine.
>
> - Gary
> ________________________________________
> From: Liam Girdwood [lrg@slimlogic.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 2:53 AM
> To: Mike Rapoport
> Cc: Mark Brown; Gary King; Axel Lin; linux-kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()
>
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:09 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > >> The third parameter of tps6586x_set_bits() is the bit_mask,
> > >> thus we should use (1 << ri->go_bit) instead of ri->go_bit.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > >
> > > but I'd be much happier if someone who actually has the hardware could
> > > verify that this is OK.
> >
> > I don't have the hardware handy at the moment.
> > Gary, can you please verify the fix?
> >
>
> Do we have any news on this testing ? I'd like to have these upstream
> for rc3.
>

Applied.

Thanks

Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-27 15:07    [W:0.091 / U:1.428 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site