lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] detour TTY driver - now ttyprintk
From
Date
On 25.08.2010 (sre) at 11:16 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:14:37PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > That's one extra process, not that much, right?
> > > >
> > > > About 150K or so way too much and its not robust.
> > >
> > > Fair enough. So, with this driver, would it make sense for the distros
> > > to switch over to using it instead of the above line in their initrd?
> >
> > Distros no - I doubt any normal PC distro would turn the facility on.
> > Embedded - yes especially deeply embedded.
>
> So should this be dependent on CONFIG_EMBEDDED then?
>

Should i resend the patch with CONFIG_EMBEDDED dependency enabled? I do
not have any real objections to that, except that the driver operates
the same way regardless of the (non-)embedded configuration.

regards, Samo



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-26 19:27    [W:0.077 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site