[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH 8/9] dspbridge: add map support for big buffers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felipe Contreras []
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:09 AM
> To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> Cc: Kanigeri, Hari;;
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] dspbridge: add map support for big buffers
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> <> wrote:
> > I think, it would be good if we get rid of DMMPOOL size, if
> the liked list grow up as it is needed, there is no memory
> penalty of have all the possible iommu addresses valid
> (11000000 - FFFFFFFF). The reservation will only fail when
> there is no memory. If a software restriction is needed we
> could define a start and end addresses for iommu module
> (maybe as a parameter when the iommu handle for iva2 is got)
> and that boundaries can be taking in account at the moment of
> reserve the memory.
> What happened to this?
> IIUC what you are proposing is to remove the DMM pool
> completely, that makes sense to me. However, is it really
> needed to finish the iommu migration to do this?
> > I think the reserve/unreserved dspbridge api can disappear
> and just return the da address in the map function.
> This is something I've proposed before, so I agree :)

Yeah, that is how it will be. I have been busy with other stuffs, but now
I have finish a version with all dmm module removed and reserve/unreserve
Api removed as well. But because a the big # of patches merge in dspbrdge
I have to rebase them to the latest, I hope finish this week and send
Them again next week.


> --
> Felipe Contreras

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-24 18:35    [W:0.082 / U:16.576 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site