lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the original direction for latter use
[ executive summary: trying to explain why static variable declarations
within the body of functions is bad in kernel code. ]

* Changli Gao (xiaosuo@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, I see. But I think the static variable should stay declared outside
> > of the function scope, with a nice comment explaining why it's not
> > initialized at init-time.
> >
> > Hiding global state in function code is usually frowned upon.
> >
>
> I don't agree with you. We'd better not expose the variable which
> isn't expected to be used by others. If not, maybe someone will misuse
> it.

We are talking about a static variable usable only within a single file,
where is the problem ? A nice comment can have this effect.

> The user should only reply on the interface, but not the internal
> implementation.

I'm talking about good practice to help code review. This is way more
important than the potential "encapsulation" benefit of hiding global
state (a static variable) within the body of a function.

I remember that Andrew Morton has strong opinions about this, and I
remember being in complete agreement with him on the topic.

Thanks,

Mathieu

>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-20 15:51    [W:0.031 / U:0.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site