Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:05:53 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [000/165] 2.6.32.17-rc1 -stable review |
| |
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 02:19:19AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:15:50 -0700 > Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.32.17 release. > > There are 165 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and > > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > > > > Responses should be made by August 1, 2010, 18:00:00 UTC. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.32.17-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > I still don't see this one in 2.6.32-stable: > > commit 1f5a81e41f8b1a782c68d3843e9ec1bfaadf7d72 upstream. > Subject: ext4: Make sure the MOVE_EXT ioctl can't overwrite append-only files > > This fixes CVE-2010-2066; I'm pretty sure 2.6.32 is vulnerable.
Ick. I have 40+ ext4 patches already in this release, and here we didn't get one that really mattered :)
Ted, care to forward on the needed patch(s) to me?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |