Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:11:15 +0200 | From | Piotr Hosowicz <> | Subject | Re: ioctl definition - has it changed recently? |
| |
On 16.08.2010 09:59, Piotr Hosowicz wrote: > On 16.08.2010 09:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Monday 16 August 2010 09:11:33 Piotr Hosowicz wrote: >>>> and then make it use the unlocked_ioctl operation. >>> >>> This I do not know. Can You help me? >>> >> >> Just take a look at all the other patches that went into the >> kernel to do this for other drivers.
I do not know how to find them. :-(
> You only really >> need to change the line with .ioctl=... to .unlocked_ioctl=
Ok, this is simple.
>> and change the prototype of the referenced function to >> >> static long foo_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned >> long arg) > > int nv_kern_ioctl(struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned > long); > > It seems different. How to change it? Now it works, I built it without > your remarks, exactly how I described on my blog: > > http://phosowicz.jogger.pl/2010/08/15/nvidia-graphics-in-fresh-kernels/
Ok, as I wrote the prototypes differ. What should I do with the inode parameter?
Regards,
Piotr Hosowicz
-- - Za moich czasów to w sklepach był tylko ocet i denaturat! - Tato, przestań, że w całym Tesco był tylko ocet i denaturat! NP: - NB: 2.6.36-rc1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |