[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Per file dirty limit throttling
    On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 10:39 +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
    > Oh, nice. Per-task limit is an elegant solution, which should help during
    > most of the common cases.
    > But I just wonder what happens, when
    > 1. The dirtier is multiple co-operating processes
    > 2. Some app like a shell script, that repeatedly calls dd with seek and skip?
    > People do this for data deduplication, sparse skipping etc..
    > 3. The app dies and comes back again. Like a VM that is rebooted, and
    > continues writing to a disk backed by a file on the host.
    > Do you think, in those cases this might still be useful?

    Those cases do indeed defeat the current per-task-limit, however I think
    the solution to that is to limit the amount of writeback done by each
    blocked process.

    Jan Kara had some good ideas in that department.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-17 10:27    [W:0.020 / U:3.956 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site