[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 03:46:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I don't see a problem with the patch, but my low level understanding of
> > the __get_cpu_var vs. per_cpu isn't very strong.
> __get_cpu_var() gets you the value on the current cpu, per_cpu() takes a
> cpu argument.

Well I know that much. :-) It seems that __get_cpu_var depends on
preemption being disabled whereas per_cpu does not? Though for some
reason I thought __get_cpu_var would be more atomic when it grabbed the
current cpu such that you wouldn't need to disable preemption. Guess not.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-16 16:15    [W:0.199 / U:5.308 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site