[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/11] fs, block: propagate REQ_FLUSH/FUA interface to upper layers
    Hello, Jan.

    On 08/12/2010 11:24 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
    > On Thu 12-08-10 14:41:30, Tejun Heo wrote:
    >> Propagate deprecation of REQ_HARDBARRIER and new REQ_FLUSH/FUA
    >> interface to upper layers.
    >> * WRITE_BARRIER is marked deprecated and WRITE_FLUSH, WRITE_FUA and
    >> WRITE_FLUSH_FUA are added.
    >> * REQ_COMMON_MASK now includes REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA so that they are
    >> copied from bio to request.
    >> * BH_Ordered is marked deprecated and BH_Flush and BH_FUA are added.
    > Deprecating BH_Ordered is fine but I wouldn't introduce new BH flags for
    > this. BH flags should be used for buffer state, not for encoding how the
    > buffer should be written (there were actually bugs in the past because of
    > this). Being able to set proper flags when calling submit_bh() in the rw
    > parameter is enough.

    Ah, okay, I was just trying to match the BH_Ordered usage but you're
    saying just requiring submit_bh() users to specify appropriate REQ_*
    (or WRITE_*) in @rw is okay, right? I'll drop the bh part then.



     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-13 09:25    [W:0.022 / U:28.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site