[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/11] fs, block: propagate REQ_FLUSH/FUA interface to upper layers
Hello, Jan.

On 08/12/2010 11:24 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 12-08-10 14:41:30, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Propagate deprecation of REQ_HARDBARRIER and new REQ_FLUSH/FUA
>> interface to upper layers.
>> * WRITE_BARRIER is marked deprecated and WRITE_FLUSH, WRITE_FUA and
>> WRITE_FLUSH_FUA are added.
>> * REQ_COMMON_MASK now includes REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA so that they are
>> copied from bio to request.
>> * BH_Ordered is marked deprecated and BH_Flush and BH_FUA are added.
> Deprecating BH_Ordered is fine but I wouldn't introduce new BH flags for
> this. BH flags should be used for buffer state, not for encoding how the
> buffer should be written (there were actually bugs in the past because of
> this). Being able to set proper flags when calling submit_bh() in the rw
> parameter is enough.

Ah, okay, I was just trying to match the BH_Ordered usage but you're
saying just requiring submit_bh() users to specify appropriate REQ_*
(or WRITE_*) in @rw is okay, right? I'll drop the bh part then.



 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-13 09:25    [W:0.317 / U:9.176 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site