Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:28:27 +0300 | Subject | Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three | From | Felipe Contreras <> |
| |
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:52:22PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> 4) no, we can't say anything about what opportunistic suspend means in practice > > Here I disagree. The Android folks have used it for quite some time. > We might not be able to apply their experience directly to other software > stacks, but we should nevertheless be able to learn quite a bit from it.
So when it comes to practice you are relying solely on what Android people say.
If it's true that it's easy to spot the "PM-driving applications", then it shouldn't be hard for a guy from the Android team to assemble a basic typical system (X.org, dbus, etc.) with suspend-blockers in a couple of days.
-- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |