[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: remove __phys_reloc_hide
2010-08-10 (화), 19:46 +0900, Namhyung Kim:

> No problem. :-) But before that, let me clarify this: It seems
> -fno-strict-overflow is all about the signed arithmetic and
> __pa_symbol() does unsigned one. Is it really matters here?

Oops, my bad, I found the description of -fstrict-overflow in gcc manual
that it also affects the semantics of pointer and unsigned integer
arithmetic. Sorry for the noise.

Namhyung Kim

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-11 07:47    [W:0.048 / U:7.736 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site