Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:45:08 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv10 2.6.35-rc6-tip 9/14] trace: uprobes trace_event interface |
| |
Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 02:04:14PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> Srikar Dronamraju wrote: >>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig >>> index c681fa7..16e2a8c 100644 >>> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig >>> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig >>> @@ -482,6 +482,22 @@ config RING_BUFFER_BENCHMARK >>> >>> If unsure, say N. >>> >>> +config UPROBE_EVENT >>> + bool "Enable uprobes-based dynamic events" >>> + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES >>> + depends on MMU >>> + select UPROBES >>> + select PROBE_EVENTS >>> + select TRACING >>> + default n >>> + help >>> + This allows the user to add tracing events on top of userspace dynamic >>> + events (similar to tracepoints) on the fly via the traceevents interface. >>> + Those events can be inserted wherever uprobes can probe, and record >>> + various registers. >>> + This option is required if you plan to use perf-probe subcommand of perf >>> + tools on user space applications. >>> + >> Possible enhancement: Moving this config right after KPROBE_EVENT, because >> those two provide similar dynamic events. >> >> Thank you, > > > In fact this could be a menu "Dynamic Probes", perhaps default off, inside > which Kprobes and Uprobes would be default on (but depend on "Dynamic Probes"). > > So that you can quickly enable them all in one.
Hmm, I disagree with it, because both Kprobes and Uprobes provides APIs for modules too.
I'd like to suggest below config tree
Kenrel hacking - Kprobes - Uprobes - Tracing -- Dynamic Events depends on Kprobes || Uprobes or select Kprobes && Uprobes
Thank you,
-- Masami HIRAMATSU 2nd Research Dept. Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
| |