Messages in this thread | | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Date | Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:50:02 -0700 | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.35 |
| |
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote: > > There hasn't been nearly enough review or testing of this patch > series yet. Before a merge, it needs to be split up in smaller, > more digestable chunks for more comprehensive review, regression > testing and behavioural analysis.
I dunno. We merge _way_ scarier things in the VM and the block layer, for much less actual upside, and with less review.
The RCU pathname lookup has some rather impressive performance upsides, and I agree that it would be good to get a lot of review and testing, but the latter isn't going to happen without it being mainlined, and the former is sadly lacking. The person I'd like most to review it is Al, but anybody in the filesystem world should basically see it as a #1 priority, because unlike all the masturbatory patches like xstat() that add new functionality that nobody will likely ever use, Nick's patchseries improves on the thing that everybody uses heavily every day without even thinking about it.
Is it tough to review? Yes. It's core code, not just some random addition that adds a new feature and doesn't impact any old code. But that's also the thing that makes it meaningful, and makes me think it should get merged _much_ more eagerly than most code we ever see.
Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |