lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
> > > I should have made a stronger point:
> "power-aware" is _not_ a good
> > > term for these applications. 

Strongly disagree. The whole point is that they
ARE VERY MUCH AWARE and interact with a power
policy to achieve goals.

Like refusing to power down active subsystems,
or actively powering down inactive ones.
Q.E.D. ... "aware".


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-02 00:41    [W:0.210 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site