lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: high power consumption in recent kernels
From
Date
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 04:57 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:06:32 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 01:45 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> >
> > > it seems that some of the (?)recent(?) changes have increased the
> > > power consumption of my note book considerably.
> > >
> > > First of all, running powertop with normal programs started, but
> > > doing nothing, I am still at 14W while I could go down to 9W before
> > > (but the 9W was with dimmed display).
> > >
> > > In the list of top causes for wakeup I have
> > > Top causes for wakeups:
> > > 34.2% (185.3) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick
> > > 23.9% (129.6) [extra timer interrupt]
> > > 10.8% ( 58.6) firefox-bin
> > > 9.2% ( 49.7) [iwlagn] <interrupt>
> > > 7.2% ( 39.1) [kernel core] hrtimer_start (tick_sched_timer)
> > > 3.9% ( 20.9) PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad interrupt
> > > which show one new thing to me I haven't seen before, the Loa
> > > balancing tick.
> >
> > I think that is what powertop calls our regular tick (Arjan?), and as
>
> it's "hrtimer_start_range_ns (tick_sched_timer)" if it's done by the
> idle thread.
>

then wth is "[kernel scheduler] load balancing tick"?
and for that matter, what is "[extra timer interrupt]", surely the timer
hardware doesn't generate spurious interrupts?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-08 14:01    [W:0.396 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site