Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:15:48 -0700 | From | Yinghai Lu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/16] x86, memblock: Add get_free_all_memory_range() |
| |
On 07/27/2010 10:02 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 11:43 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> + /* Take out region array itself at first*/ >> + if (memblock.reserved.regions != memblock_reserved_init_regions) >> + memblock_free(__pa(memblock.reserved.regions), sizeof(struct memblock_region) * memblock.reserved.max); >> + > > More of that horror. Don't. > > Another option from what i proposed earlier is to actually have a function > inside mm/memblock to free it (memblock_free_arrays()) that does nothing > if memblock is to survive init. > > I hate exporting variables or data structures like that. Functions are > semantically a lot cleaner.
Please check if you are ok with this one. if so please put it in your branch. then I could rebase the second half patchset and ask hpa to put all in tip.
Thanks
Yinghai
[PATCH] memblock: Add memblock_free/reserve_reserved_resgions()
So we can avoid export memblock_reserved_init_regions() Suggested by Ben.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
--- include/linux/memblock.h | 2 ++ mm/memblock.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/memblock.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/memblock.h +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ extern int memblock_can_resize; if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) u64 memblock_find_in_range(u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align); +int memblock_free_reserved_regions(void); +int memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(void); extern void __init memblock_init(void); extern void __init memblock_analyze(void); Index: linux-2.6/mm/memblock.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memblock.c +++ linux-2.6/mm/memblock.c @@ -170,6 +170,30 @@ u64 __init_memblock memblock_find_in_ran return memblock_find_base(size, align, start, end); } +/* + * Free memblock.reserved.regions + */ +int memblock_free_reserved_regions(void) +{ + if (memblock.reserved.regions == memblock_reserved_init_regions) + return 0; + + return memblock_free(__pa(memblock.reserved.regions), + sizeof(struct memblock_region) * memblock.reserved.max); +} + +/* + * Reserve memblock.reserved.regions + */ +int memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(void) +{ + if (memblock.reserved.regions == memblock_reserved_init_regions) + return 0; + + return memblock_reserve(__pa(memblock.reserved.regions), + sizeof(struct memblock_region) * memblock.reserved.max); +} + static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, unsigned long r) { unsigned long i;
| |