Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 28/31] memblock: Export MEMBLOCK_ERROR again | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:24:22 +1000 |
| |
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:15 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 11:21 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > will used by x86 memblock_x86_find_in_range_node and nobootmem replacement > > > > -v2: use 0 instead -1ULL, Suggested by Linus, so we don't need cast them later to unsigned long > > The patch in its current form is a NAK. > > You can't just do those two things in one commit. > > If we're going to switch LMB errors to always be 0, we need to ensure we > cannot realistically hand out 0 as a result of lmb_alloc(). > > I'll cook up a patch to do that.
BTW. After that, maybe send a patch completely removing MEMBLOCK_ERROR ?
I find 0 to be self-explanatory enough.
Cheers, Ben.
> Ben. > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> > > --- > > include/linux/memblock.h | 1 + > > mm/memblock.c | 2 -- > > 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > > index 70bc467..89749c4 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > > #include <asm/memblock.h> > > > > #define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 > > +#define MEMBLOCK_ERROR 0 > > > > struct memblock_region { > > phys_addr_t base; > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > > index 796ef8c..3d0a754 100644 > > --- a/mm/memblock.c > > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > > @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ int memblock_can_resize; > > static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1]; > > struct memblock_region memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1]; > > > > -#define MEMBLOCK_ERROR (~(phys_addr_t)0) > > - > > /* inline so we don't get a warning when pr_debug is compiled out */ > > static inline const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type) > > { >
| |