[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] kconfig: implement select with values
Hi Sam,

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Sam Ravnborg <> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:37:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> This is a fairly brute force approach to allowing a Kconfig "select"
>> to specify an excplicit value for the selected config sybmol.
>> The syntax of select is changed to:
>>       "select" <symbol> [<expr>] ["if" expr]
>> The approach taken is to add a list of <value, dependency expression>
>> pairs to the symbol and check them whenever the reverse depends (from
>> a current-style select) are checked.
> I do not see the need for this feature.
> I have read most of the postings in the defconfig battle and
> I saw Linus' select suggestion.
> But we can do almost all of this today (or tomorrow).
> Consider following Kconfig file:
>    config USB_SUPPORT
>            def_bool n
>    config NET
>            def_bool y
>    source arch/x86/Kconfig
> We use the feature that we can specify the same
> config option several times.
> And the first default value that is "visible"
> will be used.
> So it allows us to enable and disable any option.
> And if we for example want to set a specific LOG_BUF_SHIFT
> we use the same trick:
>    config LOG_BUF_SHIFT
>            int
>            default 14

Cute. I didn't know this was possible. I'll give it a try and see
how it works for me. Do override config options also pickup
select/depends constraints applied by later definitions? I think that
would be necessary to kick out warnings when a defconfig selection
isn't actually achievable.


> Now in the original suggestion of Linus he used:
>    KBUILD_KCONFIG=Mykconfig make allnoconfig
> And "allnoconfig" would make the modified defaults useless.
> But the soon-to-be-introduced alldefconfig is more sensible.
> alldefconfig uses default values for everything.

I basically used defconfig in the prototype that I posted. I think it
works well for me, and I've got it integrated into the build targets
(just like Stephen's earlier patch) without having to do a


Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-27 00:49    [W:0.049 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site