[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH UPDATED 1/3] vhost: replace vhost_workqueue with per-vhost kthread
    On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 09:41:22AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > Hello,
    > On 07/24/2010 09:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
    > >> I've created kthread_worker in wq#for-next tree and already converted
    > >> ivtv to use it. Once this lands in mainline, I think converting vhost
    > >> to use it would be better choice. kthread worker code uses basically
    > >> the same logic used in the vhost_workqueue code but is better
    > >> organized and documented. So, I think it would be better to stick
    > >> with the original implementation, as otherwise we're likely to just
    > >> decrease test coverage without much gain.
    > >>
    > >>;a=commitdiff;h=b56c0d8937e665a27d90517ee7a746d0aa05af46;hp=53c5f5ba42c194cb13dd3083ed425f2c5b1ec439
    > >
    > > Sure, if we keep using workqueue. But I'd like to investigate this
    > > direction a bit more because there's discussion to switching from kthread to
    > > regular threads altogether.
    > Hmmm? It doesn't have much to do with workqueue. kthread_worker is a
    > simple wrapper around kthread. It now assumes kthread but changing it
    > to be useable with any thread shouldn't be too hard. Wouldn't that be
    > better?

    BTW, kthread_worker would benefit from the optimization I implemented
    here as well.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-07-26 17:33    [W:0.019 / U:4.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site