Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Patch] kexec: increase max of kexec segments and use dynamic allocation | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:19:49 -0700 |
| |
Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> writes:
> So, what is a better number? 2048? :)
I was thinking something a little ridiculous like 10K or 64K.
Assuming the usage you care about is something like hibernate on a machine with disjoint memory where you truly need one segment for each memory region.
The only point of a limit at all once we introduce dynamic allocation is to catch buggy apps.
Eric
| |