lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] cfq-iosched: fixing RQ_NOIDLE handling.
Date
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:08:23PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> So, I'm still in favor of Corrado's approach. Are there any remaining
>> dissenting opinions on this?
>
> Nope. I am fine with moving all WRITE_SYNC with RQ_NOIDLE to sync-noidle
> tree and also marking jbd writes as WRITE_SYNC. By bringing dependent
> threads on single service tree, we don't have to worry about slice
> yielding.
>
> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

Corrado, would you mind reposting the patches and adding:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>

Thanks!
Jeff


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-20 16:05    [W:0.132 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site