Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] posix-timers: Refactoring of CPUCLOCK* macros | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:02:28 -0700 |
| |
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 22:59 +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > Daniel Walker a écrit : > > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 13:34 +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > >> This is merely a preparation to introduce wall time > >> clocks for threads/processes. All occurences of > >> CPUCLOCK* macros were replaced by CLOCK*. > > > > It seems like it would be better to make this naming more specific that > > less. Couldn't you say "POSIX_CLOCK" or something like that? > > > > Daniel > Hi Daniel. > Sure. However, technically, my wall clocks have nothing to do > with POSIX. Still the code is inside a file with "posix" prefix, > so you are right. > I will resend patch series as soon as it is done. Could you > elaborate on another patches?
I wasn't suggesting that adding "POSIX" is the only option, but adding something more so it's not just "CLOCK" .
You mean you want me to review the other patches also ?
Daniel
-- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |