lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: emacs and "linux" coding style
    On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 06:51:46AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
    > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:21:03 +0200 Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
    >
    > > Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net> writes:
    > >
    > > > static void update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu,
    > > > unsigned long sd_shares,
    > > > unsigned long sd_rq_weight,
    > > > unsigned long *usd_rq_weight)
    > > > {
    > >
    > > From a technical POV the above should not have any tabs, the parameters
    > > should be aligned with spaces only.
    >
    > fwiw, it seems that you agree with Ted.

    Actually, what my code use is tabs with a tab stop of 8 followed by
    enough spaces (< 7) to align function parameters and to align
    open/close parenthesis in C expression line wrap.

    The main problem seems to be that Chapter 9 in
    Documentation/CodingStyle is written by someone who feels that since
    vi makes it easy to only align parameters using tabs, that everybody
    should do it the same way as vi. I'm simply challenging Chapter 9 as
    being canon. I certainly ignore it, and as a maintainer I tend to
    accept either vi or emacs-style indentations with respect to
    parameters and C expressions.

    - Ted


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-07-18 09:21    [W:0.021 / U:60.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site