lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: csum errors
On 07/15/2010 12:35 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:32:12PM +0200, Johannes Hirte wrote:
>
>> Am Donnerstag 15 Juli 2010, 21:03:09 schrieb Chris Mason:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 08:30:17PM +0200, Johannes Hirte wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am Dienstag 13 Juli 2010, 14:23:58 schrieb Johannes Hirte:
>>>>
>>>>> ino 1959333 off 898342912 csum 4271223884 private 4271223883
> Great. The bad csums are all just one bit off, that can't be an
> accident. When were they written (which kernel?). Did you boot a 32
> bit kernel on there at any time?
>

I've seen this as well, with three files. In all instances, csum ==
*private + 1. Here are the unique lines from dmesg:

[32700.980806] btrfs csum failed ino 320113 off 55889920 csum 2415136266
private 2415136265
[32735.751112] btrfs csum failed ino 1731630 off 24776704 csum
1385284137 private 1385284136
[32738.777624] btrfs csum failed ino 2495707 off 171790336 csum
1385781806 private 1385781805

All three files are from when I first transitioned to btrfs (or more
accurately, they are clones of those files I made to hold onto a copy of
the corrupted version). Since the vast majority of my disk usage comes
from the transition anyway, I can't be sure this is due to a problem
only present at that time. I believe I was running 2.6.34 when I copied
my files over to my new btrfs partition, but I'm going from memory here.

My btrfs partition has never been touched by a 32-bit kernel.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-17 06:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog