| Date | Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:20:32 -1000 | From | Zachary Amsden <> | Subject | Re: KVM timekeeping fixes, V2 |
| |
On 07/16/2010 03:19 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:25:20PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote: > >> Discovered brammage in patches due to unresolved merge. >> Also, had to move 09/18 past 08/18 to resolve compile issue. >> > Have you tested this patchset with Nested SVM? We had TSC handling > related bugs there in the past and should make sure to keep it working. >
I've been very careful to keep nested SVM safe, but I've not got a good test for that. Is there any test suite for the nested case?
It took a lot of guessing to figure out why it works and why the code looks imbalanced, but I now understand the way it is now is logical and correct.
|