lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: tq 2440
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 05:35:26PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:16:30PM +0800, Conke Hu wrote:
> > > ever notice to the following kernel log?
> > > "Device 's3c2440-nand' does not have a release() function, it is
> > > broken and must."
> > > release() function should be implemented in the platform_device.
> >
> > That's not telling you to provide a release function. The warning is
> > telling you that a device is being unregistered which doesn't have a
> > release function.
> >
> > Consider this point - maybe it doesn't have a release function because
> > it's not supposed to be unregistered?
>
> Heh, well, it is being unregistered, and at that point in time, the
> kernel complains.

The unregistration occurs because platform_register_devices() (which is
used by arch code to register a block of platform devices) undoes its
work if one of the devices fails to register.

I've long since thought, since I created that function, that this probably
isn't desirable behaviour, and it should continue to register as many
devices as it possibly can.

> All kobjects need a release function that actually frees it. If not,
> that is a logic bug. Please see the Documentation/kobject.txt file for
> details.

How do you free a statically declared platform device?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-15 19:13    [W:0.075 / U:1.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site