lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: stable? quality assurance?
From
Date
Le dimanche 11 juillet 2010 à 19:58 +0400, William Pitcock a écrit :
> ----- "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Something like 2.6.32.16 : Its probably more stable than all 2.6.X
> > kernels.
>
> 2.6.32.16 (possibly 2.6.32.15) has a regression where it is unusable
> as a Xen domU. I would say 2.6.32.12 is the best choice since who knows
> what other regressions there are in .16.
>

Yea, strictly speaking, you can be sure no kernel will be bug free,
ever.

This is why I said "probably more stable" ;)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-11 18:37    [W:0.084 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site