lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2
    On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 08:13:04AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > Did you plan to resubmit this with the few review comments addressed?
    > I'd really hate to not see this in 2.6.36.

    I've been doing some more testing on it, and while I can get a 25%
    reduction in the time to create and remove 10 million inodes with
    per-sb shrinker, I can't get the reclaim pattern stable enough for
    my liking.

    At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a
    context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e. the
    original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which
    combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst
    retaining the stability of the courrent code....

    Cheers,

    Dave.
    --
    Dave Chinner
    david@fromorbit.com


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-07-12 04:43    [W:0.020 / U:29.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site