Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:41:04 +1000 | From | Dave Chinner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2 |
| |
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 08:13:04AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Did you plan to resubmit this with the few review comments addressed? > I'd really hate to not see this in 2.6.36.
I've been doing some more testing on it, and while I can get a 25% reduction in the time to create and remove 10 million inodes with per-sb shrinker, I can't get the reclaim pattern stable enough for my liking.
At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e. the original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst retaining the stability of the courrent code....
Cheers,
Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com
| |