lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Topcliff PHUB: Generate PacketHub driver
Date
Hi Arnd

We are studying your indication.
> My feeling is that this ioctl interface is too
> low-level in general. You only export access to specific
> registers, not to functionality exposed by them.
> The best kernel interfaces are defined in a way that
> is independent of the underlying hardware and
> convert generic commands into device specific commands.

I have a question.
We don't know 'generic commands' concretely.
Let me know 'generic commands' in detail.

Thanks. Ohtake.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
Cc: "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Andrew" <andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com>; "Intel OTC"
<joel.clark@intel.com>; "Wang, Qi" <qi.wang@intel.com>; "Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@intel.com>
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Topcliff PHUB: Generate PacketHub driver


> On Friday 04 June 2010, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> > From: Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
> >
> > This patch adds the Packet Hub driver for Topcliff.
> > Patch created against 2.6.33.1
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
>
> Most of the comments from my first review still apply to
> this version, please have another look at what I wrote
> back in april, see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/158879
>
> Note also that patch submissions should be against the latest
> development kernel, in this case 2.6.35-rc2, not against stable
> kernel releases like 2.6.33.1.
>
> Arnd
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-08 10:51    [W:0.090 / U:8.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site