lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/sfi: fix ioapic gsi range
On 06/08/2010 01:59 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> No. There is no reason to loose 16 IDT entries indefinitely. We may
> need a boot time allocation when we see we have isa irqs, to replace
> the static allocation that we have. But for the most part we dynamically
> idt entries aka vector numbers today, and there is no reason we can't
> generalize that in the future.
>

Well, that boot time allocation is one of the things
legacy_pic->nr_legacy_irq is used for, and it really makes sense, I
think. I would really like to move away from a compile-time allocation,
and I still find it hard to believe it has a reason to exist.

-hpa



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-08 23:11    [W:0.057 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site