lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 08/10] oom: use send_sig() instead force_sig()
Date
Oleg, I parsed your mention mean following patch, correct?


===========================================
Oleg pointed out oom_kill.c has force_sig() abuse. force_sig() mean
ignore signal mask. but SIGKILL itself is not maskable.
So, we can use send_sig() sefely.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index e7d3a5d..599f977 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem)
p->rt.time_slice = HZ;
set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);

- force_sig(SIGKILL, p);
+ send_sig(SIGKILL, p, 1);

return 0;
}
--
1.6.5.2




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-08 14:03    [W:0.075 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site