lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock
      Hi Reinette,

    BTW, this:
    Jun 3 12:05:43 localhost kernel: [174170.391756] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0:
    TX Power requested while scanning!
    happened even w/o toggling radio switch, so this seems not uniquely
    related to toggling the radio switch.

    On mer 2010-06-02 @ 10-51-25 -0700, reinette chatre wrote:
    # On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 13:12 -0700, Nils Radtke wrote:
    #
    # > This line indicates the first timestamp _after_ the crash:
    # > May 31 17:35:19 localhost kernel: [ 69.488456]
    # >
    # > The crash happened after site A and on site B. Just arrived, opened lid and *crash*.
    # >
    # > I noticed in iwl-agn-rs.c:2080:
    # > BUG_ON(window->average_tpt != ((window->success_ratio *
    # > tbl->expected_tpt[index] + 64) / 128));
    # > Could that be again the point that hit me today when the machine crashed once?
    # > Would you mind changing this into a milder WARN? That way I wouldn't hit the wall
    # > that hard. And I would notice it anyway while skimming the logs as we still are on the
    # > hunt. It's more maintainable if it's a WARN in the src instead of me patching it w/ any
    # > update..
    # >
    # > Wasn't this BUG_ON a WARNING in .33.3? (didn't check..)
    #
    # Seems like you performed the testing without the patch that we used to
    # address the hang issue from the beginning of this thread. Please see
    Indeed, that's what it feels like. It is just so annoying, that one..
    You can't work w/ the kernel drivers. That's a shame.
    BTW, iff the patch for the BUG_ON is in kernel src since 2.6.28, that might
    explain a lot of crashes before where I haven't never been able to track it down.
    Even more, those days I hadn't a chance to do more on this. Unlike now.

    # http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127290931304496&w=2 - that thread
    # also explains why the patch is not in 2.6.34.
    It should definitely and absolutely be merged (change the BUG_ON into WARNING).
    Even if, like hypothesized, the bug is hidden elsewhere, a BUG_ON doesn't get
    me far, it's killing every chance to advance to a solution. How am I supposed
    to investigate w/ the kernel crashing? BTW, I don't like working w/ a Linux
    kernel that kills my work regularly, I think that's understandable. If I needed
    a break from work, I'd set an alarm.

    I've seen a bugreport on this issue on the redhat bts referencing my word about
    this BUG_ON only getting hit w/ cisco APs. There's a wide range of AP manufacturers
    out there in the city. But only cisco APs are crashing this driver. Admittedly, only
    on one single location, but anyway it's a cisco. Always the same MAC, unless they
    use to reassign MAC addresses, though..

    I think it's a tough one, if an AP is able to crash the driver.

    I haven't yet received a comment of yours regarding my many other questions in
    my previous message. I am willing to help investigate more, assist in other ways
    than testing only (always only doing testing isn't a way to keep up fun..)

    # I think it is time to move this discussion to a bug report so that it
    # can be tracked better. Please open a new bug at
    # http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/
    As you wish. It's probably a good idea. But I still miss the registration mail
    from bz, did register yesterday.

    So, please see to it, that the patch rendering the BUG_ON into a
    WARNING finds it's way back in.

    Thank you very much,


    Nils Radtke




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-06-04 18:59    [W:0.024 / U:0.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site