Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch v2] fcntl: return -EFAULT if copy_to_user fails | From | Eric Dumazet <> | Date | Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:42:43 +0200 |
| |
Le jeudi 03 juin 2010 à 22:24 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa a écrit : > (2010/06/03 22:10), Nick Piggin wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:38:03PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> This is really ugly. > >> > >> static inline int sec_copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3) > >> { > >> int res = copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3); > >> > >> return (res> 0) ? -EFAULT : res; > >> } > > > > It would be unfortunate if it adds more confusion. I'd prefer to have > > a sufficiently different name. memcpy_to_user/memcpy_from_user > > perhaps? > > Then, and memclear_user() ? > > > >
We are interested by the fact that full copy is done, so maybe use the 'full' prefix ?
fullcopy_to_user() , fullclear_user() ?
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |