Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:23:19 +0400 | From | Anton Vorontsov <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.25-rc1 ahci regression |
| |
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 05:14:14PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:35:31PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 05:18:40PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote: > > > [...] > > >> Linux version 2.6.32-25.el6.x86_64 > > > > > > Hm. Can you really boot the kernels that has > > > 365cfa1ed5 applied and reverted? > > > > > > That is, do > > > > > > $ git reset --hard 365cfa1ed5 > > > $ make > > > $ ...boot... > > Linux version 2.6.34-rc7 (root@localhost) (gcc version 4.4.4 20100503 > [...] > > > And then > > > > > > $ git reset --hard 365cfa1ed5^ > > > $ make > > > $ ...boot... > > > > > Linux version 2.6.34-rc7 (root@localhost) (gcc version 4.4.4 20100503 > > (Red Hat 4.4.4-2) (GCC) ) #24 SMP Thu Jun 3 08:07:58 EDT 2010 > > Thanks. But for some reason you don't include debug > messages from the not working kernel. :-/ I presume > you use different methods to capture the log, you > should pass 'debug' kernel command line option to > actually enable these messages. Please try to > capture the debugging messages. > > Meanwhile, here is a guess: initrd isn't happy about > the new libahci.ko dependency for ahci.ko, and so it > doesn't load the module? Why? I don't know. Let > me check it...
Oh. It seems I found it. It must be the module order loading thing.
Can you try the patch down below?
And thanks for the patience!
diff --git a/drivers/ata/Makefile b/drivers/ata/Makefile index 20c5251..092d9e0 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/Makefile +++ b/drivers/ata/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ATA) += libata.o -obj-$(CONFIG_SATA_AHCI) += ahci.o libahci.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SATA_AHCI) += libahci.o ahci.o obj-$(CONFIG_SATA_SVW) += sata_svw.o obj-$(CONFIG_ATA_PIIX) += ata_piix.o obj-$(CONFIG_SATA_PROMISE) += sata_promise.o
| |