lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf: Default PMU ops
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:19:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 20:11 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:09:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 20:07 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:34:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:03 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > > > > You mean, if (!pmu->start_txn && pmu->pmu_enable) { /* install defaults
> > > > > > > */ } ?
> > >
> > > > neglected pmu implementations shouldn't impact software pmus.
> > >
> > > With the above and not providing ->pmu_enable you get that.
> >
> >
> > But we don't need to provide a pmu_enable for software events, right?
>
> My point exactly.


Which I understand late. Agreed.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-29 20:23    [W:0.078 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site