[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: trying to understand READ_META, READ_SYNC, WRITE_SYNC & co
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:27:59AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 07:25:56PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Biggest thing is multiple small files operations like on the same
> > directory. Best case I measured back when doing AS io scheduler
> > versus deadline was about 100x improvement on a uncached kernel
> > grep workload when competing with a streaming writeout (the writeout
> > probably ended up going somewhat slower naturally, but it is fairer).
> As I mentioned below I absolutely see the case for reads. A normal
> grep basically is a dependent read kind of workload. For for writes
> it should either be O_SYNC-style workloads or batched I/O.

Sorry I missed that. OK well that may be true. One would hope
it was benchmarked before being merged.

But I'm sure apps can submit fsyncs much faster than once per
few ms, like small database transactions.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-26 12:13    [W:0.038 / U:70.460 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site