[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH] timer: Added usleep[_range][_interruptable] timer
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Patrick Pannuto <> writes:
> Overall it seems like a good improvement.
>> +
>> +static inline void usleep(unsigned long usecs)
>> +{
>> + usleep_range(usecs, usecs);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long usleep_interruptible(unsigned long usecs)
> Is the interruptible case even needed? I assume most drivers won't
> bother with that and not being interruptible for a few usecs is not a
> big issue.

Honestly, I don't think so, but I was mirroring the msleep API when
I wrote it so I included it for completeness. I can't think of a use
case where it is necessary / useful. I will remove it unless anyone
can think of an application for it?

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-24 18:53    [W:0.093 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site